Fast, Friendly, Free Case Evaluation

SUBMIT YOUR INFORMATION FOR OUR LAWYER TO CONTACT YOU WITHIN 1 HOUR FOR A FREE CASE EVALUATION

Send Your Message

Cook Medical Company Information

Cook Medical had a humble beginning. It started as Bill Cook designed an innovative catheter in his apartment during the 1960s. By the 1970s, the company grew to international levels and expanded its product offerings to satisfy urological and women’s health needs. As the century turned, Cook Medical established itself as the largest privately held medical manufacturer in the country.

Besides its financial successes as a medical empire, the company has made waves by publicly opposing the Affordable Care Act, which imposes a tax on medical devices. Other problems facing Cook include lawsuits against its transvaginal mesh devices.

Recalls Against Cook Medical Company

Like most major manufacturers in the medical industry, Cook Medical has had to overcome a few recalls. On March 2011, the FDA issued the strongest “Class I” recall for its central venous catheter instrument. This product was used to monitor a patient’s venous pressure, collect blood samples, and administer fluids and medication. According to documentation, certain catheter trays and kits contained liquids that could cause the devices to become desterilized.

More recently, the FDA issued a recall of Cook’s Zilver PTX Drug-Eluting Stent. There were a number of complaints the unit’s delivering port separated at the tip of the inner catheter. Under these circumstances, it was necessary for a person to undergo surgery to have the tip removed. Thrombosis and cardiac arrest were possible side effects as well. Cook’s own investigation uncovered a part of the injection system used for implanting the stent did not meet established design criteria.

Lawsuits Facing Cook Medical Company

Lawsuits have been filed against Zilver PTX stents. Multiple complaints emerged stating the tips could separate before exiting the body. The company admitted the problems stemmed from a defect in the delivery system. The side effects of the faulty devices can be tragic. To receive compensation for pain, suffering, and wrongful death, numerous victims filed claims against Cook Medical.

A growing number of IVC filter lawsuits are mounting against Cook Medical as well. These devices are treatment alternatives used in patients who are at risk to have blood clots break off and head to the lungs. The spider-like devices enter the inferior vena cava, and legs extend to “catch” clots before they cause damage to other organs. Cook’s IVC filters have been associated with numerous complications. It is alleged the devices’ legs break and cause internal injuries. A study published in “Cardiovascular International Radiology” stated 100 percent of Cook’s IVC filters caused perforations within 71 days of implantation. Another 40 percent tilted out of position. Victims claim Cook new about the faults but never warned doctors. Many individuals underwent corrective surgeries to remove the devices and are fighting for adequate compensation to cover pain and suffering.

More serious lawsuits are emerging against Cook’s vaginal mesh products. Over 40 cases have been filed against the manufacturer’s Surgisis and Stratasis devices. Effected women fight these items are defective and cause dangerous complications. One of the first lawsuits came from a woman in Georgia claiming she suffered numerous infections and permanent nerve damage from this mesh device and required corrective surgery.

The biggest difference between Cook’s transvaginal mesh devices and similar offerings from other manufacturers is the material makeup. Cook’s mesh slings are crafted from pig intestines, which the company touts as safe and effective. However, numerous patients receiving these products are at high risk of developing inflammation and adhesions. Plaintiffs allege Cook misrepresented its products to the public. There were no warnings about the potential dangers that come from using these devices.

Verdicts Against Cook Medical Company

Cook Medical faces over 100 lawsuits against women who suffered injuries from the company’s vaginal mesh products. It is one of many major manufacturers being sued over these type of devices. These mesh makers have paid out millions of dollars to settle these kinds of cases, and Cook is expected to experience the same fate. More than 50,000 claimants against Cook are taking legal action.

FDA Sanctions Against Cook Medical Company

The FDA has issued sanctions against many manufacturers of transvaginal mesh products. In 2011, the federal agency presented a health warning about potential complications associated with surgical mesh procedures. Cook expressed support for this ruling but urged the organization to perform further examinations into its products and how they differ from the competition. Cook explained its devices are biologic, which makes them safer than synthetic products. However, certain doctors believe Cook’s devices are weaker and cause more infections than synthetic products.

In October 2014, the FDA sent a warning letter to Cook Medical over problems discovered during routine facility inspections. Its Bloomington, Indiana plant manufactures vascular devices. Inspectors uncovered issues concerning Cook’s corrective and preventative action procedures. Besides failing to perform adequate quality tests on a representative sample size, it did not use correct procedures to test materials received from an outsourced company. Further inspections raised eyebrows as well. These forced Cook Medical to push back anticipated complete dates for new plants.

The problems are just beginning to mount against Cook Medical. As more and more victims come forward and claim injuries from the manufacturer’s transvaginal mesh products, Cook is sure to be paying a high sum of money for its negligent product. It appears this is not the end of financial woes for the company. To fund the Affordable Care Act, Cook may be forced to pay $20 million in taxes each year. This places its United States expansion on hold. Its immediate plans are to focus on overseas growth.

Contact an Experienced Personal Injury Lawyer

After an accident, the responsible party's insurance company may try to reduce the claim amount. Commonly, insurance adjusters are trained to get information from the injured to assist in reducing the claim. Though some insurers are less guilty of this practice than others, it is important to realize that insurance companies are profit-oriented corporations and reducing claims results in increased profits for shareholders. This can create a situation for the injured in which they are offered a settlement that does not truly reflect the damages suffered. If you accept this settlement, you lose the ability to get more money should your injuries require further medical treatments. It is critical that victims get legal assistance in any personal injury case, and The Doan Law Firm is prepared to fight relentlessly for your rights.

Send Your Information For A Free Case Evaluation Within 1 Hour

Send My Information